PMS vs. AIF: The Fork in the Road for India's Sophisticated Investor

Your money. Your name. Or, your money in a pool. The choice matters more than you think.

Introduction: Two Doors, One Goal

You've crossed the ₹50 lakh threshold. Perhaps you've crossed ₹1 crore. The mutual fund world suddenly feels too crowded, too vanilla, too average.

You're ready for something more.

Two doors stand before you: PMS (Portfolio Management Services) and AIF (Alternative Investment Funds). Both promise sophistication. Both are SEBI-regulated. Both cater to HNIs and UHNIs.

But here's what most advisors won't tell you upfront: they are fundamentally different animals — structurally, operationally, and in ways that could have profound implications for your career compliance.

Let's unpack both, so you can walk through the right door.

Part 1: The Core Difference — Ownership vs. Pooling

This is the single most important distinction. Everything else flows from here.

PMS: Your Money, Your Demat, Your Name

When you invest in a PMS, your capital is not pooled with other investors. Every security in the portfolio sits in your own demat account. You can log in and see exactly which stocks you own. The shares are registered in your name.

The portfolio manager has the mandate to buy and sell on your behalf — but the assets remain unmistakably yours.

Think of it as hiring a chef to cook in your kitchen, using your ingredients. The meal is yours. The kitchen is yours. The chef just brings the expertise.

AIF: Your Money Joins a Pool

An AIF is a pooled investment vehicle. Your capital mingles with that of other investors into a common fund. You receive "units" of the fund — not the underlying securities.

The investment manager deploys the pooled corpus according to a defined strategy. You don't own individual stocks or bonds. You own a share of the pool.

Think of it as investing in a restaurant. You're a part-owner of the business, but you don't get to take home the kitchen equipment.

💡 Key Insight: PMS = Direct ownership of securities AIF = Indirect ownership via fund units

This distinction has cascading effects on taxation, transparency, liquidity, and — critically — compliance.

Part 2: The Compliance Question — Why Structure Matters for Your Career

Here is where things get interesting — and where most comparisons fall short.

If you work at a Big 4 firm, an MNC bank, a consulting firm, or any organization with access to Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI), your investment choices are not entirely your own. Your employer's compliance policies likely require pre-approval for any investment in listed securities.

This is where the PMS vs. AIF distinction becomes career-critical.

The PMS Problem (For Restricted Employees)

In a PMS, you directly own stocks. Every buy and sell transaction appears in your demat account. This means:

• Every trade may require pre-clearance from your compliance team
• You may need to disclose each holding to your employer
• Trading windows, blackout periods, and contra-trade restrictions apply to you
• If your firm is advising a company, and your PMS buys that stock — you could be in violation of insider trading norms

For employees at banks, audit firms, and advisory firms, running a PMS can become a compliance nightmare. Each rebalancing cycle could trigger a fresh round of approvals.

The AIF Advantage (For Restricted Employees)

An AIF, by contrast, is a blind pool. You don't control what the fund buys. You don't even know, in most cases, what the fund is buying until after the fact.

SEBI has clarified (in informal guidance to Yes Bank in 2022) that employees covered as Designated Persons can invest in AIFs — provided they have no control or influence over the fund's investment decisions.

The logic is simple: if you can't dictate what the fund buys, you can't be accused of trading on inside information.

📌 For professionals at Big 4, MNC banks, or advisory firms: AIF offers a compliance-friendly path to equity exposure — without the paperwork and restrictions that come with direct ownership.

Part 3: Structure, Liquidity, and Lock-ins

Beyond compliance, the two structures differ in practical ways.

On Liquidity

PMS is generally open-ended. You can exit (subject to fund terms) without waiting years. This suits investors who value flexibility.

AIFs, especially Category I and II, often have multi-year lock-ins — sometimes 5-7 years. Category III AIFs (hedge-fund style) may offer more liquidity ( once in a mnonth), but with higher volatility.

If your time horizon is long and your capital is patient, the lock-in isn't a problem. If you might need access within 2-3 years, PMS offers more breathing room.

Part 4: Taxation — The Hidden Variable

Tax treatment varies significantly between the two.

PMS Taxation

Since you directly own the securities, every transaction is taxed in your hands:

• Short-term capital gains (held < 1 year): 20%
• Long-term capital gains (held > 1 year): 12.5% (above ₹1.25 lakh)

A PMS that rebalances frequently will generate more short-term gains — and a higher tax bill.

AIF Taxation

AIFs are taxed based on their category:

• Category I & II AIFs: Pass-through taxation. Gains flow to investors and are taxed at individual rates.
• Category III AIFs: Taxed at the fund level. Business income taxed at ~40%+. Capital gains as per STCG and LTCG tax rates.

The tax efficiency depends on the AIF's strategy and your personal tax situation. Consult your CA before committing.

Part 5: Who Should Choose What?

Let's cut through the noise.

Choose PMS If:

✅ You want direct ownership and full transparency ✅ You value liquidity and the ability to exit on your terms ✅ You don't have compliance restrictions at work ✅ You want a customized portfolio (e.g., exclude certain sectors) ✅ You prefer seeing your holdings in your own demat

Choose AIF If:

✅ You work at a Big 4, MNC bank, or advisory firm with UPSI restrictions ✅ You want equity exposure without pre-clearance headaches ✅ You have a long-term horizon (5+ years) and can accept lock-ins ✅ You want access to alternative strategies — private equity, venture capital, hedge-fund approaches ✅ You're comfortable with pooled, NAV-based reporting

Part 6: The Hybrid Reality

Many sophisticated investors don't choose one or the other — they use both.

• PMS for their core, liquid equity allocation — where they want transparency and control
• AIF for satellite exposure to alternatives — private credit, venture, long-short strategies

The two structures complement each other. They serve different purposes in a well-constructed portfolio.

Final Thought: Structure is Strategy

Most investors obsess over returns. Fewer think about structure. But structure determines:

• What you own
• How you're taxed
• What compliance obligations you trigger
• How easily you can exit

Before you compare performance numbers, ask the more fundamental question: Which structure fits my life?

If you're a banker, auditor, or consultant navigating UPSI rules — the AIF's pooled structure might be more than a preference. It might be a necessity.

If you're an entrepreneur or professional without such restrictions — PMS gives you the transparency and control that many investors crave.

Either way, choose with clarity. The right structure, paired with the right strategy, is how wealth compounds without friction.

Key Takeaways:

📌 PMS = Direct ownership in your demat. Full transparency. Full compliance burden. 📌 AIF = Pooled investment. Blind pool. Lower compliance friction for restricted employees. 📌 Big 4 / MNC bank / advisory firm employees: AIF often makes more sense due to UPSI and pre-clearance requirements. 📌 Liquidity: PMS offers flexibility. AIF often requires multi-year commitment. 📌 Taxation: PMS is taxed at your level. AIF taxation varies by category. 📌 The best portfolios often use both — PMS for core equity, AIF for alternatives.

At Grey Sky Capital, we offer a SEBI-registered PMS built on quantitative, rules-based investing. For investors who value direct ownership, transparency, and systematic discipline — without the emotional baggage of traditional stock-picking. We will also be launching strategues under AIF CAT III format

If you're exploring which structure fits your life, we're happy to help you think through it — even if the answer isn't us.

   •       •   

Link copied